When the sale of a business falls apart, everyone involved in the transaction is disappointed – usually. Sometimes the reasons are insurmountable, and other times they are minuscule – even personal. Some intermediaries report a closure rate of 80 percent; others say it is even lower. Still other intermediaries claim to close 80 percent or higher. When asked how, this last group responded that they require a three-year exclusive engagement period to sell the company. The theory is that the longer an intermediary has to work on selling the company, the better the chance they will sell it. No one can argue with this theory. However, most sellers would find this unacceptable.

In many cases, prior to placing anything in a written document, the parties have to agree on price and some basic terms. However, once these important issues are agreed upon, the devil may be in the details. For example, the Reps and Warranties may kill the deal. Other areas such as employment contracts, non-compete agreements and the ensuing penalties for breach of any of these can quash the deal. Personality conflicts between the outside advisers, especially during the
due diligence process, can also prevent the deal from closing.

One expert in the deal-making (and closing) process has suggested that some of the following items can kill the deal even before it gets to the Letter of Intent stage:

• Buyers who lose patience and give up the acquisition search prematurely, maybe under a year’s time period.
• Buyers who are not highly focused on their target companies and who have not thought through the real reasons for doing a deal.
• Buyers who are not willing to “pay up” for a near perfect fit, failing to realize that such circumstances justify a premium price.
• Buyers who are not well financed or capable of accessing the necessary equity and debt to do the deal.
• Inexperienced buyers who are unwilling to lean heavily on their experienced advisers for proper advice.
• Sellers who have unrealistic expectations for the sale price.
• Sellers who have second thoughts about selling, commonly known as seller’s remorse and most frequently found in family businesses.
• Sellers who insist on all cash at closing and/or who are inflexible with other terms of the deal including stringent reps and warranties.
• Sellers who fail to give their professional intermediaries their undivided attention and cooperation.
• Sellers who allow their company’s performance in sales and earnings to deteriorate during the selling process.

Deals obviously fall apart for many other reasons. The reasons above cover just a few of the concerns that can often be prevented or dealt with prior to any documents being signed.
If the deal doesn’t look like it is going to work – it probably isn’t. It may be time to move on.

© Copyright 2015 Business Brokerage Press, Inc.

Photo Credit: jppi via morgueFile

Putting a price on privately-held companies is more complicated than placing a value or price on a publicly-held one. For one thing, many privately-held businesses do not have audited financial statements; these statements are very expensive and not required. Public companies also have to reveal a lot more about their financial issues and other information than the privately-held ones. This makes digging out information for a privately-held company difficult for a prospective purchaser. So, a seller should gather as much information as possible, and have their accountant put the numbers in a usable format if they are not already.

Another expert has said that when the seller of a privately-held company decides to sell, there are four estimates of price or value:

1. A value placed on the company by an outside appraiser or expert. This can be either formal or informal.
2. The seller’s “wish price.” This is the price the seller would really like to receive – best case scenario.
3. The “go-to-market price” or the actual asking price.
4. And, last but not least, the “won’t accept less than this price” set by the seller.

The selling price is usually somewhere between the asking price and the bottom-dollar price set by the seller. However, sometimes it is less than all four estimates mentioned above. The ultimate selling price is set by the marketplace, which is usually governed by how badly the seller wants to sell and how badly the buyer wants to buy.

What can a buyer review in assessing the price he or she is willing to pay? The seller should have answers available for all of the pertinent items on the following checklist. The more favorable each item is, the higher the price.

•  Stability of Market
•  Stability of Historical Earnings
•  Cost Savings Post-Purchase
•  Minimal Capital Expenditures Required
•  Minimal Competitive Threats
•  Minimal Alternative Technologies
•  Reasonable Market
•  Large Market Potential
•  Reasonable Existing Market Position
•  Solid Distribution Network
•  Buyer/Seller Synergy
•  Owner or Top Management Willing to Remain
•  Product Diversity
•  Broad Customer Base
•  Non-dependency on Few Suppliers

There may be some additional factors to consider, but this is the type of analysis a buyer should perform. The better the answers to the above benchmarks, the more likely it is that a seller will receive a price between the market value and the “wish” price.

© Copyright 2015 Business Brokerage Press, Inc.

Photo Credit: cohdra via morgueFile